Dior & Galliano Guilty of “Poor Quality” Copyright Infringement, Plagiarism

April 15th, 2007 by Daily Contempt
    Celebrity Gossip

John Galliano’s fashion design company was ordered to pay $271,800 in damages to noted American photographer William Klein for unauthorized use of his work in a Christian Dior advertising campaign. 75% of the settlement was awarded for “plagiarism”, the other 25%, oddly, was ordered due to the “poor quality” of the reproductions.

 

Dior refused to comment because they insist their company is distinct from Galliano’s, even though they share a chief executive, and that Galliano is the chief designer for both.

 

The photographer, fresh on the heels of recent gallery success, does not general permit advertisement use of his works. Dior, ironically, is famous for aggressively pursuing those infringing on their own copyrights. Galliano insists he’ll appeal the ruling on the same kind of bogus technicalities that lost him the court case in the first case.





Related Posts:
  • Judge Agrees to Dismiss Carol Burnett’s Absurdly Frivolous Lawsuit
  • ParisExposed.com Back in Action, Unlike Paris Hilton Who is Still in Jail
  • His Name Is Prince, And He is Elderly!
  • LeBron James Slam Dunks Another Kid into his Unwed Girlfriend
  • Willie Nelson Pleads Guilty to 2-Pounds of Drugs, Gets Misdemeanor Fine
  • ++

    No Comments so far
    Leave a comment



    Leave a comment